Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹é»ö±¤°ú û»ö±¤ ½ºÄ³³Ê¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Áö´ëÄ¡ Àλóü ½ºÄ³´×ÀÇ ¹Ýº¹ÀçÇö¼º ºñ±³

Comparison of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 37±Ç 4È£ p.213 ~ 218
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀüÁøÈÆ:Jeong Jin-Hun ¼ºÈ¯°æ:Sung Hwan-Kyung/¹Îº´±¹:Min Byung-Kuk/ȲÀç¼±:Hwang Jae-Sun/±èÁöȯ:Kim Ji-Hwan/±è¿õö:Kim Woong-Chul

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study compared of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners.

Methods: To evaluate reproducibility with white and blue light scanners, the impression of premolar were rotated by 10¡Æ~20¡Æ and scanned. These data were compared with the first 3-D data (STL file), and the error sizes were measured (n=5). Independent t test was used to evaluation the reproducibility of impression of premolar with white versus blue light scanners through discrepancies of mean, RMS (¥á=0.05).

Results: Discrepancies of mean with regard to reproducibility were 11.2§­, 5.8§­, respectively, with white and blue light scanners (p<0.047). And discrepancies of RMS with regard to reproducibility were 33.4§­, 18.8§­, respectively, with white and blue light scanners (p<0.045).

Conclusion: Our results indicate a good reproducibility of prepared tooth impression digitized with blue light scanner more than that with white light scanner.

Å°¿öµå

white light scanner; blue light scanner; reproducibility; color-difference-map

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI